User talk:湯崩正海

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 湯崩正海!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:ScreenShot moca.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ScreenShot moca.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:ScreenShot moca.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Netora.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

jawp での言論への返答[edit]

moca のロゴの削除依頼の議論も停滞しているようですが、何も言わず議論から離れる行為をおやめください」 (w:ja:special:diff/95692245)なる言論を得たため回答します。 わたしが対話拒否をしたような印象操作に及ばれたことは極めて不快。わたしから追記する事項がないのにどうしろというのでしょうか。 --eien20 (talk) 09:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • 当該ページで、あなたが、「議論をしています。」とおっしゃいましたよね。議論が終了したとお思いなら仕方がないですが、普通、議論をしているのに 3 週間も空けますか。私だったらタブを残して議論が終わるまで閉じないですよ。 湯崩正海 (talk) 09:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • 追記: 画像もご自身で投稿され、削除依頼も出されたのですよね。なら、最後まで議論に参加すべきでしょう。--湯崩正海 (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • 横から失礼します。結論からいえば、eien20さんが仰っていることが全てです。JAWPでの一連のやり取り含め、湯崩正海さんの理屈は通りません。3週間空けているのではなく、議論は十分煮詰まっており、対処者の終了判定を待っている状態と判断できます。それと、湯崩正海さんはJAWPにおいても既に数多くの問題行動を起こされていることを自覚してください。私自身、JAWPであなたに対するコメント依頼提出を検討している程です。お願いですからご自身の言動を見直し、改善に努めてください。
    203.165.22.144 07:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • 他の利用者会話ページヘの草案の投稿など、問題があったことは自覚しますが、Wikipedia:削除依頼/Moca (eラーニングシステム)での「審議妨害」及び「逐次反論」なる行為はしておらず、削除されないように「記事改善の対応」及び「私のページヘの移動」を「報告」及び「提案」、または「質問への回答」をしたまでです。そこはご理解ください。
    湯崩正海 (talk) 19:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:秘密のたからばこ (新書).webp has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gahukuro (talk) 12:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • お教えくださり、ありがとうございます。
湯崩正海 (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:青島ビール放尿動画事件.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:青島ビール放尿動画事件.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

eien20 (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

{{PD-reason|中華人民共和国国内で作成された作品において、[[s:en:Copyright_Law_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China_(2020)#article 24|中華人民共和国著作権法第24条]]により、ニュース報道を目的として、新聞、定期刊行物、ラジオ局、テレビ局その他の媒体に掲載された著作物からやむを得ず複製または引用することが許可されています。また、[[s:ja:著作権法#第四十一条|日本国著作権法第四十一条]]により、写真、映画、放送その他の方法によつて時事の事件を報道する場合には、当該事件を構成し、又は当該事件の過程において見られ、若しくは聞かれる著作物は、報道の目的上正当な範囲内において、複製し、及び当該事件の報道に伴って利用することができます。さらに、[[s:en:Copyright_Act_of_1976#§_107._Limitations_on_exclusive_rights:_Fair_use|アメリカ合衆国著作権法第107条]]によって、批評、解説、ニュース報道、教授(教室での利用のための複数のコピー作成行為を含む)、研究、調査等を目的とする利用が許可されています。これらの規定の範囲内であれば、作者の許可なしに作品を利用することができます。''{{center|[[File:Flag of People's Republic of China.svg|72px]] [[File:Flag of Japan.svg|72px]] [[File:Flag of USA.svg|72px]]}} }} 湯崩正海 (talk) 22:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(このコメントはEien20さんによって2023年11月2日 (木) 08:18(UTC)に付与されたものです。)--湯崩正海 (talk) 09:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • 日本国著作権法第十一条二項で規定されている通り、事実の伝達にすぎない雑報及び時事の報道は、前項第一号に掲げる著作物に該当しないと思います。--湯崩正海 (talk) 09:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hi, 湯崩正海, this is a fair use statement and Wikimedia Commons does't allow "Fair use" content. See COM:FU. 0x0a (talk) 10:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • ご意見お寄せくださり、ありがとうございます。事実の伝達にすぎない雑報及び時事の報道は、前項第一号に掲げる小説、脚本、論文、講演その他の言語の著作物に該当しない。つまり、小説、脚本、論文、講演その他の言語の作品は著作物であり、それではない=この法律で言う著作物でないので保護されないと思います。
    湯崩正海 (talk) 11:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yes, that's truth. But it only applies to text in China and most other countries. 0x0a (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I estimate the file origin states is PRC. it is not relate Japanese law. (この画像の本国は中華人民共和国と推定されます。日本の法令は関係ありません。) --eien20 (talk) 12:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • 毎度ありがとうございます。中華人民共和国著作権法第5条では、事実または出来事に関する単なる情報は同法の保護にかけられないとされていますが、創作物でもない実際の事件関連の画像は、単なる事実です。こちらの雛型もあります。
Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China: Article 5 This law shall not apply to:
(1) laws and regulations, resolutions, decisions and orders of State organs, other documents of a legislative, administrative or judicial nature and the official translations thereof;
(2) mere information about facts or happenings; and
(3) calendars, numerical tables and forms of general use, and formulas.
Flag of the People's Republic of China
Flag of the People's Republic of China

This work is from any of the items above and is in the public domain in Mainland China and possibly other jurisdictions. For works whose copyright has expired, see also {{PD-China}} and {{PD-PRC}}.

PD-PRC-exempt Public domain in the People's Republic of China //commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%E6%B9%AF%E5%B4%A9%E6%AD%A3%E6%B5%B7

湯崩正海 (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This court decision may help you understand this term. In summary, the news pictures that the photographer creatively expresses the objective facts of current events should be protected by the copyright law. 0x0a (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • その判決文を見ようとして、アカウントを作成しようと試みてみましたが、電話番号認証のための電話番号を送信できなかったので、見るのを諦めます。申し訳ございません。
  • たとえば、ある人目の付かない場所でなにか事件が起こったとしましょう。偶然通りかかった写真家がその事件の瞬間で、しかもその内容が衝撃的で巧妙な手口を写しているのであり、その程度が写真を見ただけで概ねどんな事件かはっきりわかり、再現性の余地がないものになると、本人が権限を放棄または没後50年でPDにならない限り、独創性があるとして保護されるでしょう。
  • しかし、この事件の場合、そもそも動画(写真)を撮影するためにでっち上げられた事件であるため、模倣による再現度が高く、また、写真の内容が非常に簡素であるため、独創的とは言えないでしょう。今では世界中に衝撃が走りましたが、昨今でも世界の至る所で迷惑動画が撮影されており、この事件も数ある迷惑動画の中のひとつでしかなく、珍しいものではありません。
  • 今回の場合は、一概に事件と関係あるからなどという理由で著作権を排除できるわけでもないですので、作品が示す内容をよく考えてみるといいのかもしれません。
湯崩正海 (talk) 02:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, I've uploaded the related court decisions to Google Drive [1]. You can use Google Translate to convert to Japanese. A bit of a disclaimer is in order: I am not a legal person and cannot give professional advice. I can only draw the following conclusions based on the court judgments and Wikipedia's policy:
1. The copyright law of China does not specify the creative threshold for photographic works.
2. News images taken by people can almost always be copyrighted (i.e. there is no lost judgment).
3. Since this picture can no longer be taken by oneself, it can be uploaded to the Chinese and English Wikipedia according to fair use (but fair use is not allowed in Japanese Wikipedia).
0x0a (talk) 05:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File copyright status[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • 前節をご覧ください。
湯崩正海 (talk) 11:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]