User talk:Ellywa

This talk page is archived regularly. Archive links: pre 2004 2004 2005 2006 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Note about my deletions

If you think I made a wrong decision about deletion of a file, please think about your motivation and ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. Another admin will decide on the matter. It is appreciated if you ping me, so I can get new insights. Thanks Ellywa (talk) 15:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of Denis-Benjamin Papineau pic

Hi, not contesting your deletion of the picture of Denis-Benjamin Papineau (File:Denis-Benjamin Papineau.jpg), but I was wondering - could you give me information on where the original drawing was located? (federal archives Ottawa, or Quebec archives, perhaps?) I may be travelling in that direction and could look into taking a picture of the original, (which is surely out of copyright by now), and then I could post my pic and transfer copyright to Wikimedia? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Mr Serjeant Buzfuz, below the information from the file page. The problem with the image is that the image is a drawing made by Lucien Martial, which is still in copyright. Please read the deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Denis-Benjamin Papineau.jpg. If you find the original photo or painting, which would date from before 1854, that can be uploaded to Commons. Uploading the drawing by Martial is not useful, as this will be deleted again. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 23:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. I understand that Martial's drawing is still in copyright, but I'm curious what source he used. Papineau had been dead for 77 years by that point, so Martial couldn't have made the drawing from life in 1931. I will poke around at BaNq and see if I can find the source that Martial had used. 71.17.186.145 00:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, that would be a success! Ellywa (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

DescriptionEllywa	Denis-Benjamin Papineau (1789-1854). Reproduction made circa 1950 of a drawing made in 1931 by Lucien Martial.
Date	1931
Source	This image is available from Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec under the reference number 3263370 This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing. image
Author	Lucien Martial (1892-1987)

Open data Tweede Kamer

Dag Elly,
Het heeft allemaal even geduurd, maar ik heb - zoals begin dit jaar besproken - dit sjabloon met toelichting voor open data van de Tweede Kamer gemaakt. Dit leidt tot een drieledig verzoek.

1. Wil je er jouw kritisch oog over laten gaan en eventuele verbeteringen aanbrengen?
2. Kun je als lid van het VRT-team het sjabloon voorzien van een verwijzing naar het toepasselijke ticket (nr. Ticket:2023020910008527)?
3. Zou je deze bestanden weer kunnen terugplaatsen? Ik zal ze dan aflopen en er ofwel dit nieuwe sjabloon ofwel een verwijzing naar de KB op plaatsen (afhankelijke van de datering; de stukken tot 1995 staan niet op tweedekamer.nl, maar zijn door de KB onder CC0 online gezet.

MarcoSwart (talk) 16:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Dag Marco, gezien de reikwijdte lijkt het mij beter dit openlijk te bespreken. Dus ik zou voorstellen jouw vraag en het antwoord erop te publiceren en de vertaling naar het sjabloon te bespreken in de copyright sectie van de Village pump en na positieve conclusie een undeletion request in te dienen. Groet, Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Suggestie uitgevoerd. MarcoSwart (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Hoi MarcoSwart,

Ik kijk even mee als derde paar ogen. Wat betreft je sjabloon:

1. De indruk wordt gewerkt drie zaken door elkaar. Artikel 11 van de auteurswet, de reguliere website en het dataportaal. De scope van het sjabloon is nu niet duidelijk. De scope verduidelijken is de eerste stap, daarna kan ik verder met je meekijken.
2. Daarvoor zijn VRT-tickets niet bedoeld.
3. Deze bestanden zijn out of scope.

Met vriendelijke groet, Natuur12 (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

1. Ik heb de suggestie van Elly gevolgd. Misschien is het een idee eerst mijn vraag en antwoord met de Tweede Kamer te lezen, omdat ik vermoed dat dat je eerste vraag beantwoord.

2. Mij is uitdrukkelijk aangeraden om VRT te gebruiken. Ik veronderstelde dat er dan ook iets met het ticketnummer moet gebeuren.

3. De verwijderreden was zuiver auteursrechtelijk. Ik ben in deze discussie beland omdat er als gevolg van deze verwijdering een bestand uit een WikiWoordenboeklemma werd verwijderd. Of een bestand niet zinvol in Wikimediaprojecten kan worden gebruikt lijkt me iets om eventueel per bestand te bespreken. MarcoSwart (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sara Ledebour - Meibloemen.jpg

Copyright status: File:Sara Ledebour - Meibloemen.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sara Ledebour - Meibloemen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:/mynewsdesk.com.se.atg/

There are still deletion templates in files discused in this closed request, remove from thse files templates. Michalg95 (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes many remained. I do not know why and how to solve this... except manually. I asked Jim, here : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jameslwoodward#deletion_template_still_on_%22kept%22_image . Ellywa (talk) 12:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Michalg95 , thanks for helping with removing the delete templates! Ellywa (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

"Cannot reproduce the alt text"

Hello Ellywa, I just wanted to nominate this file for deletion because it's an obvious copyvio from here (photographer: Pia Henkel, according to alt text), and then I find that there has already been a deletion discussion with the exact same reasoning which has been closed with you saying "I cannot reproduce the alt text" (and therefore we will keep it). I find that a bit surprising. Why would you make a decision on something if you technically can't follow the reasoning, instead of simply asking another admin to handle this one?

Here's the alt text for you: "Marlene vom UNSERDING liebt euch-Podcast (Foto: Pia Henkel)". Do you have any reason to assume that the uploader Doraaa St is, in reality, Pia Henkel?

She has in fact been asked on her German WP user page but never bothered to reply. --87.150.13.77 16:08, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

With the deeplink which was given in the deletion request I could not see the alt text and I had no reason to disbeleive the uploader. The discussion on de:wikipedia was not listed on the deletion request either. I had to take a decision based on incomplete evidence. I will nominate the image again, as you did now show the link where I can see the alt text, e.g. https://www.unserding.de/unserding/images/podcast_liebt-euch_marlene100.html. Ellywa (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pizza Tower logo.webp

Do you have time to conclude this? Trade (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes. This did not take much time.  Done Ellywa (talk) 23:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

File:GV - Rive 1934.gif / PD-Switzerland-photo

Hello Ellywa,

FYI you shoudln't add {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} to new imports. It's written on the license banner itself (This licence tag cannot not be used for new imports after April 1, 2020.) Omnilaika02 (talk) 10:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

@Omnilaika02: . Indeed. But this photo was uploaded on 18 March 2014, so it can be applied. Can you please add the template again? To prevent a new deletion request. I kept the file on basis of the pd situation in Switzerland. Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 13:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

I can't, the file is not reusable. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD Switzerland (Individuality). Omnilaika02 (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)